Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison: Best Styles for Protection, Sparkle, and Comfort
Back to Blog
Style Comparison

Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison: Best Styles for Protection, Sparkle, and Comfort

June 23, 202625 min read
S
StoneBridge Team
Jewelry Expert
Share:

A pear diamond has a look all its own. Its tapered silhouette, pointed tip, and rounded shoulder create a very different face-up effect from a round brilliant or oval, especially once you compare measurements like 9.20 x 6.10 mm on a 1.20ct pear versus 6.8 mm on a 1.20ct round. Still, the diamond is only half the story. The setting, whether that means a six-prong cathedral solitaire in 14K white gold or a full bezel in 950 platinum, shapes how the stone looks, how it wears, and how well it holds up over time.

This pear Diamond Ring Setting comparison is for shoppers who want clear trade-offs before they buy. We compare solitaire, halo, bezel, and three-stone styles using the factors that matter most in real life: tip protection, sparkle return, comfort, upkeep, and price. For reference, many shoppers today spend about $2,800-$4,200 for a 1.00ct lab-grown pear in the F-G, VS1-VS2 range, then add roughly $900-$3,500 depending on whether the setting is a simple 14K yellow gold solitaire or a more labor-intensive pavé halo.

Pear shapes need more planning than many buyers expect. The pointed tip is the most exposed part of the diamond, and if that area takes a direct hit without a properly formed V-prong, it is more vulnerable to chipping than the rounded edge of a round brilliant. The shape is also slightly asymmetrical, so a 1.50ct pear with a 1.60 length-to-width ratio can sit differently on the hand than a 1.50ct oval, and the bow-tie effect can be more noticeable in open settings.

I’ve helped hundreds of couples narrow this down, and the pattern is pretty consistent: once you compare settings by daily wear instead of just pretty photos, the right option usually becomes much clearer. A 1.20ct F-VS2 pear set low in 950 platinum often wins for someone who wears nitrile gloves at work, while a 0.90ct E-VS1 pear in a hidden halo with a pavé band usually wins for someone who wants more light return and finger coverage.

Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison at a Glance

Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison: Best Styles for Protection, Sparkle, and Comfort
Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison: Best Styles for Protection, Sparkle, and Comfort

Most shoppers start with four setting types: solitaire prong, halo, bezel, and three-stone. Each one solves a different problem. Some make the center stone look larger, some help the diamond feel safer for daily wear, and others add width across the finger or a richer overall look. In practical terms, a cathedral solitaire in 14K white gold behaves very differently from a pear halo with 1.1 mm pavé melee or a full bezel hand-fabricated in 950 platinum.

To keep this pear diamond ring setting comparison useful, we focused on the questions shoppers ask most often:

  • How well does the setting protect the pointed tip with a V-prong, partial bezel, or full bezel?
  • Which style adds the most sparkle through center-stone exposure, pavé melee, or halo framing?
  • Which one feels best for daily wear if the ring is cast in 14K white gold, 18K yellow gold, or 950 platinum?
  • How much cleaning and maintenance should you expect for prongs, pavé seats, and gallery rails?
  • Which option gives the best value if your budget is $3,500, $5,000, or $8,000 total?

Buyers usually narrow the choice faster once they compare settings by lifestyle, not just appearance. A ring that looks perfect in a photo may not feel right if you type all day, travel often, or do not want to think about snagging. A high-set pear halo with micro pavé can be stunning, but it will usually need more frequent inspection than a low-profile bezel with a comfort-fit shank.

If you’re still choosing the center stone, you can shop lab-grown diamonds or browse engagement rings to see finished styles side by side. Look closely at details like certification from GIA, IGI, or GCAL, metal type, gallery height, and whether the pear is set north-south or east-west.

Why Pear Settings Need Extra Attention

Pear diamonds combine a rounded end with a narrow point. That point can chip if it takes a hard hit, which is why jewelers often recommend a V-prong at the tip on prong-set rings. GIA, IGI, and GCAL grading reports help here because they list exact millimeter measurements, polish, symmetry, and inclusions, so you can compare a 1.18ct F-VS2 pear measuring 9.05 x 5.92 x 3.68 mm with another 1.21ct G-VS1 pear before either stone goes into a setting.

Orientation changes the look too. A north-south pear, with the tip facing the fingertip, tends to elongate the finger and is still the most common orientation in bridal. An east-west pear feels wider and more fashion-forward, especially in a half bezel or low bezel setting in 14K yellow gold, but it can take up more horizontal space across neighboring fingers.

The bow-tie effect matters too. Some pears show a darker area through the center caused by light leakage and contrast, and that feature becomes easier to read in an open basket solitaire than in a halo with 1.0-1.3 mm round melee. A halo cannot fix a poorly cut center stone, but it can visually brighten the outline and reduce how stark that contrast looks from arm’s length.

The “best” setting on paper can still feel wrong once it’s on your hand. Pears are emotional stones, but the technical side still matters: a 2.00ct pear with a tall cathedral and 3.8 mm total height above the finger will wear very differently from a 1.00ct pear in a low-slung full bezel with a 2.2 mm comfort-fit shank.

How We Rated Each Pear Ring Setting

For this pear diamond ring setting comparison, each style is judged across five core areas: protection, brilliance, comfort, maintenance, and long-term flexibility. Long-term flexibility includes band pairing, repair expectations, and whether the style still feels easy to wear years from now. Those factors become concrete fast when you compare a straight-band-friendly peg-head solitaire with a low basket halo that may require a contoured wedding band.

There are practical reasons for using those categories. More accent stones usually mean more inspection points, especially with pavé halos using 0.8-1.2 mm melee. Higher-set prongs can snag more often, while full and partial bezels often lower impact risk during daily wear. Metal choice matters too, since 950 platinum prongs displace differently under wear than 14K white gold prongs, and both need periodic inspection by a bench jeweler.

Our customers often ask which setting is the safest and which one looks biggest. Those are fair questions. The right answer depends on how you live, how often you’ll wear the ring, and whether your budget should go toward the center diamond or the setting details. A shopper with a $4,500 total budget may get better value from a 1.10ct IGI-certified F-VS2 pear in a plain solitaire than from a 0.80ct pear surrounded by a heavier double halo.

In my 10 years at StoneBridge, I’ve seen shoppers change their minds once they think about commuting, workouts, travel, and whether they want to sleep in the ring. Real life has a way of making the decision simpler. For example, a nurse may move from a cathedral pavé setting in 18K white gold to a flush-feeling bezel in 950 platinum after trying both profiles side by side.

Solitaire Pear Diamond Settings

A solitaire is the starting point in almost any pear diamond ring setting comparison because it puts nearly all attention on the center stone. If you love the shape itself, this is often the cleanest way to show it. A well-executed solitaire can make a 1.20ct F-VS2 pear feel crisp and elegant, especially when set north-south in 14K white gold with a narrow 1.8 mm band.

Most pear solitaires use a V-prong on the tip plus three to five prongs around the rounded end, which means five or six total contact points in many designs. For larger stones, especially around 2.00 carats and up, jewelers may add heavier claw prongs, a reinforced gallery rail, or a cathedral shoulder for extra stability. On a 2.30ct pear, that under-gallery support matters much more than it does on a 0.75ct stone.

The profile matters too. Cathedral solitaires lift the stone higher and create a more open look, often around 6.5-7.5 mm off the finger depending on the head style. Low-profile solitaires sit closer to the hand, which many people find easier for everyday wear, particularly in 950 platinum or 14K yellow gold with a comfort-fit interior.

Why Shoppers Choose Solitaire

A solitaire keeps the shape crisp and easy to see. It also pairs well with straight or contoured wedding bands, Which Gives You more flexibility later. If the ring has a cathedral setting with a raised basket, a straight 2.0 mm wedding band may tuck neatly underneath, while a very low basket may need a slight contour.

Because there are no side stones to distract the eye, the center diamond does all the work. That is beautiful with a well-cut pear, but it also means color, clarity, and symmetry are easier to notice. A 1.00ct D-VS1 will read differently from a 1.00ct H-SI1 in an open solitaire, and so will a stone with noticeable asymmetry between the shoulders.

A great pear solitaire is hard to beat for an engagement ring because it feels personal, timeless, and quietly confident. It is also one of the clearest value plays: a simple 14K white gold solitaire setting may start around $900-$1,600, leaving more of a $4,000-$6,000 budget available for the center diamond itself.

Pros and Cons of a Solitaire Setting

Pros

  • Timeless look with strong focus on the center stone, especially with a 1.00-2.00ct pear in a V-prong basket
  • Usually lower cost than halo or three-stone designs, often about $900-$1,800 in 14K gold and $1,400-$2,400 in 950 platinum
  • Easier to pair with many band styles, from plain metal to pavé eternity bands
  • Works with classic, modern, and vintage-inspired details such as claw prongs or cathedral shoulders

Cons

  • Less visual size boost than a halo with 0.10-0.30 total carats of pavé melee
  • More exposed edges than a bezel, even with a properly formed V-prong
  • Higher profiles may catch on clothing, especially peg-head or tall cathedral styles
  • Cut quality, bow-tie contrast, and color are easier to see, for better or worse

For many shoppers, a solitaire with a V-prong hits the sweet spot. It protects the tip, keeps the ring classic, and lets more of the budget stay with the diamond itself. If you are pricing a 1.00ct lab-grown pear at $2,800-$4,200, pairing it with a solitaire rather than a halo can be the difference between choosing F-VS2 instead of G-SI1.

Halo Pear Diamond Ring Settings

Halo styles rank high in any pear diamond ring setting comparison because they make the center diamond look larger and brighter. Small accent diamonds trace the outline of the pear and add extra surface sparkle, usually through pavé-set round melee in the 0.8-1.3 mm range. On a 0.90ct pear, a halo can create a face-up impression closer to what some shoppers expect from a 1.10ct or 1.20ct center alone.

That can make a real difference on size perception. A halo around a 0.90ct center often gives a stronger face-up look than the center stone alone, without the price jump that can come with moving to a much larger diamond. Since diamond prices tend to rise at common size thresholds like 1.00 and 1.50 carats, many buyers use halos to stretch visual impact. For lab-grown, a 0.90ct F-VS2 pear may fall around $2,300-$3,400, while a matching halo setting in 14K white gold with pavé can add roughly $1,600-$2,900.

There are a few halo formats worth comparing:

  1. Standard halo: accent stones frame the center from the top view, often with a V-prong still protecting the tip.
  2. Hidden halo: accent stones sit just under the center’s edge and sparkle from the side, commonly paired with a solitaire-like top view.
  3. Double halo: two rows of diamonds create the biggest, boldest look and can add 0.30-0.70 total carat weight in accent stones.

Where Halo Settings Shine

A halo adds brightness around the edges, which makes the outline feel more defined. It can also help a slender pear feel fuller across the hand. If the center has a slightly narrow 1.70 length-to-width ratio, a halo can visually soften that elongated shape and create more presence from shoulder to shoulder.

This style suits buyers who want a decorative ring right away. If you already know you want extra detail and a larger-looking top view, a halo often makes the decision easier. Hidden halos are especially popular with 1.00-1.50ct centers in 14K white gold because they preserve a cleaner top view while still adding sparkle from the profile.

Halos also have a celebratory feel that many people love for proposals and milestone gifts. When someone opens the box and gets that instant flash from every angle, it usually comes from a combination of center-stone light return and dozens of small pavé diamonds catching light across the gallery, basket, and halo frame.

Pros and Cons of a Halo Setting

Pros

  • Strongest sparkle effect among common setting styles because pavé melee add extra scintillation
  • Noticeable visual size increase, especially around 0.70-1.20ct center stones
  • Rich, decorative look from the start, whether in hidden halo, standard halo, or double halo form
  • Great choice for smaller center stones that need more presence without jumping into the next carat bracket

Cons

  • More cleaning because lotion, soap, and dust collect around pavé stones and under-gallery openings
  • Higher cost than many solitaires, often about $1,600-$3,200 in 14K gold and higher in 950 platinum
  • More maintenance points over time because each melee seat and prong can loosen with wear
  • Less minimal than a simple prong design and sometimes harder to pair flush with a straight band

According to common bench repair patterns, rings with more small accent stones usually need inspection more often than simpler designs. That is not a flaw. It is part of owning a more detailed ring. A pavé halo should ideally be checked every 6 to 12 months, especially if the ring is worn daily and cast in 14K white gold with fine micro pavé beads.

Bezel and Three-Stone Pear Ring Settings

A strong pear diamond ring setting comparison should not stop at halo versus solitaire. Bezel and three-stone designs answer very different needs, and each has a clear audience. A bezel leans practical, often with a low profile and smooth outer wall, while a three-stone setting leans expressive, especially when built around side stones like half-moons, trapezoids, or round brilliants.

A bezel wraps metal around the stone’s edge, while a three-stone setting adds side stones for width and presence. One may use a full 950 platinum rim hugging the pear’s girdle, and the other may feature a 1.25ct pear center with two 0.20ct round brilliant sides in F-VS quality. The engineering, labor, and wear experience are completely different.

Bezel Settings for Pear Diamonds

A bezel setting gives the pear its best physical protection among common engagement ring styles. The metal frame helps shield both the pointed tip and the outer edge, which is why active buyers often come back to this option. On a full bezel, the metal lip usually covers the girdle continuously, reducing exposure more than a five-prong or six-prong head can.

Many bezel-set rings also sit lower on the hand. That reduces snagging and gives the ring a smooth, easy feel for daily wear. A low bezel in 14K yellow gold or 950 platinum often works well for teachers, healthcare professionals, and anyone who wears gloves or prefers a ring that does not catch on knitwear.

I recommend bezel settings often for buyers who already know they want low-fuss wear. If you are hard on jewelry or just do not want to baby your ring, this style tends to make life easier. A 1.00ct IGI-certified pear in a full bezel may cost a bit more in labor than a basic solitaire, but the trade-off in daily durability is very real.

Pros and Cons of a Bezel Setting

Pros

  • Best tip protection in this pear diamond ring setting comparison because the metal frame shields the vulnerable point
  • Smooth profile with low snag risk, especially in low-set full bezel designs
  • Secure feel for active lifestyles, travel, and frequent hand use
  • Clean, modern look in 950 platinum, 14K yellow gold, 14K white gold, or mixed-metal combinations

Cons

  • More metal changes the outline of the stone and can slightly reduce the airy look of the pear
  • Less open appearance than a prong setting, particularly from the side profile
  • May feel less traditional to some buyers who want visible prongs and a classic bridal silhouette

A full bezel offers the most coverage. A partial bezel leaves more of the diamond visible while still protecting key areas, and it can be a smart middle ground for buyers who want the security of a bezel without fully framing the girdle.

Three-Stone Settings for Pear Diamonds

A three-stone ring pairs the pear center with side stones such as rounds, trapezoids, half-moons, or smaller pears. The result is broader finger coverage and a more custom look. A common version might feature a 1.20ct pear center with two 0.25ct round brilliants in F-G, VS quality, while a more architectural version could use tapered baguettes or trapezoids for a cleaner side profile.

This style can make a modest center stone feel larger overall because the side stones increase spread across the finger. It also opens the door to design choices that feel more personal, including matched fancy-shape side stones, claw prongs, and cathedral shoulders in 18K yellow gold or 950 platinum.

There is also something warm and meaningful about a three-stone ring for an engagement, anniversary, or wedding gift. Many couples love the symbolism, and it can make the ring feel even more tied to their story. From a technical angle, it is also a high-design format where proportion matters a lot: side stones that are too large can visually overpower a 0.90ct pear center.

Pros and Cons of a Three-Stone Setting

Pros

  • Strong visual spread across the finger, especially with round or half-moon side stones
  • High customization potential through side-stone shape, metal choice, and gallery design
  • Luxurious look without needing a halo around the center pear
  • Great fit for shoppers who want a statement ring with more than solitaire simplicity

Cons

  • Higher cost due to extra stones and labor, often about $1,800-$4,000 for the setting before the center diamond
  • More design decisions to get right, including side-stone size, shape, and symmetry
  • Poor side-stone balance can compete with the center and make the design feel crowded

If you want presence but do not want a halo, this may be your best route. It brings more width and detail without fully framing the center stone, and it can make a 1.00ct pear feel substantially more substantial across the hand than a plain solitaire.

Side-by-Side Pear Diamond Ring Setting Comparison Table

A side-by-side view makes this pear diamond ring setting comparison easier to use while you shop. Here is how the four most common styles stack up when you compare real-world wear, maintenance, and budget ranges for settings in 14K gold or 950 platinum.

Setting Type Tip Protection Sparkle Impact Visual Size Effect Maintenance Comfort for Daily Wear Price Range Wedding Band Compatibility Best For
Solitaire Prong Better with V-prong Good to Very Good Good Low to Moderate Good to Very Good $900-$2,400 setting only Excellent Timeless simplicity
Halo Better with V-prong halo head Best Best Moderate to High Good $1,600-$3,500 setting only Good Maximum brilliance
Bezel Best Good Good Low Best $1,200-$3,000 setting only Good to Very Good Active lifestyles
Three-Stone Good to Better Very Good Very Good to Best Moderate Good $1,800-$4,000+ setting only Good Statement presence

Here is the quick read:

  • Best for protection: Bezel, especially a full bezel in 950 platinum
  • Best for sparkle: Halo, particularly pavé or hidden halo styles with round melee
  • Best for minimalism: Solitaire, especially a cathedral or low-profile V-prong design
  • Best for visual spread: Three-stone, particularly with round or half-moon sides
  • Best all-around classic option: Solitaire with a V-prong in 14K white gold or platinum

These results show up so often because each setting pushes a different strength. A solitaire stays clean and classic, a halo chases brightness and size effect, a bezel favors wearability, and a three-stone design adds width and drama. If your total budget is around $5,000, those differences can determine whether your center stone lands at 0.90ct or 1.25ct.

Which Pear Setting Fits Your Lifestyle?

The best choice in a pear diamond ring setting comparison depends less on trends and more on daily habits. Do you work with your hands, want a ring that stays low and smooth, or want maximum sparkle every time you look down? Those questions matter just as much as whether the center stone is a 1.00ct F-VS2 lab-grown pear or a 1.50ct G-VS1 with a slightly elongated ratio.

Here are the buyer profiles we see most often:

  1. Choose a solitaire if you want timeless style, easy band pairing, and the clearest view of the center diamond in a V-prong basket or cathedral setting.
  2. Choose a halo if you want a larger-looking ring, more sparkle, and a decorative finish such as hidden halo pavé or a standard halo frame.
  3. Choose a bezel if you care most about protection, comfort, and low-fuss wear, especially in a low-profile 950 platinum mounting.
  4. Choose a three-stone if you want more finger coverage, extra detail, and a custom feel through side-stone shapes like rounds, half-moons, or trapezoids.

Budget changes the answer too. A solitaire often keeps more of the spend focused on the center diamond. A halo can create a bigger look without jumping to the next carat bracket. A three-stone ring usually costs more because it includes extra stones and labor. A bezel may cost a bit more than a simple prong setting, but many buyers like the trade for added protection. As a rough example, a 1.00ct lab-grown F-VS2 pear with IGI certification may run $2,800-$4,200, and the same center can feel very different in a $1,100 solitaire versus a $2,700 halo.

Hand size and center stone size matter as well. A 0.70ct pear can feel delicate in a solitaire and more substantial in a halo, especially on finger sizes 7 to 8. A 2.00ct pear often has enough presence on its own, so a halo becomes more of a style choice than a size fix. On very petite fingers, a 1.50ct pear with half-moon sides may create better balance than a double halo with a wide footprint.

If you’re still comparing directions, try our ring builder or browse our fine jewelry collection for matching bands and stackable styles. Pay attention to whether the setting is shown in 14K white gold, 14K yellow gold, 18K yellow gold, or 950 platinum, because metal color changes how a pear’s body color reads from the side.

Expert Take: Which Setting Wins?

If you want the broadest winner in this pear diamond ring setting comparison, a solitaire prong setting with a well-made V-prong usually offers the best balance. It protects the most vulnerable point, keeps the center stone front and center, and works with many wedding bands. A 1.20ct F-VS2 pear in a cathedral solitaire with a 1.8 mm to 2.0 mm band is one of the most consistently successful combinations we see.

There is not one answer for everyone.

  • Pick a bezel if durability is your first priority, especially for daily wear in 950 platinum or 14K yellow gold.
  • Pick a halo if you want maximum sparkle and a bigger-looking top view, particularly around 0.75-1.25ct center stones.
  • Pick a three-stone style if you want width, detail, and a more custom look with rounds, trapezoids, or half-moons.

GIA does not assign a standard overall cut grade to pear diamonds the way it does for round brilliants, so proportions matter more during selection. Many shoppers prefer pear length-to-width ratios between about 1.45 and 1.75, though taste varies. That range is not a rule, but it gives you a useful starting point when comparing certified stones from GIA, IGI, or GCAL, especially once you match those proportions to a specific head style.

Regular inspections make a difference, especially on halos and three-stone rings with smaller accent diamonds. A quick prong and stone check every 6 to 12 months can help catch wear before it becomes a repair. Lab-grown diamonds are chemically and physically real diamonds, so they are generally safe in an ultrasonic cleaner, but pavé settings, antique-style milgrain, and fragile prongs should still be checked before frequent ultrasonic use.

If I were giving a friend the simplest advice, it would be this: choose the setting that matches your real routine first, then chase the extra sparkle second. That order tends to lead to fewer regrets later. A ring worn every day in 14K white gold or 950 platinum needs to feel good at the grocery store, at work, and on a plane, not just under showroom lights.

Shop Pear Ring Settings With More Confidence

Ready to move from comparison to real options? Start with your top priority: classic style, extra sparkle, stronger protection, or more finger coverage. Once that is clear, narrow by metal, certification, and budget, whether that means a GIA-graded natural pear, an IGI-certified 1.00ct lab-grown F-VS2, or a GCAL-certified premium option with strong optical performance.

A smart next step looks like this:

The best pear diamond ring setting comparison does not end with a chart. It ends with a ring that fits your routine, your taste, and your budget. For some buyers that means a $3,900 total ring with a 1.00ct lab-grown pear in a plain 14K yellow gold solitaire. For others it means an $8,500 build with a 1.50ct F-VS1 pear, hidden halo, pavé band, and platinum head. The important part is that the ring feels easy to love from day one and easy to maintain years later.

FAQ

What is the best setting for a pear shaped diamond ring?

The best setting depends on what you want your ring to do every day. In most cases, a solitaire with a V-prong gives the best mix of classic style, center-stone focus, and easy band pairing. If protection matters most, a full bezel setting in 950 platinum or 14K gold is often the better choice in a pear diamond ring setting comparison. If you want a bigger-looking ring with more sparkle, a halo with pavé melee usually leads.

Is a halo or solitaire better for a pear diamond?

A halo is better for buyers who want extra brilliance, more visual size, and a decorative look. A solitaire is better for people who want a cleaner design, fewer maintenance points, and more flexibility with wedding bands. In a pear diamond ring setting comparison, halos usually win on sparkle, while solitaires win on simplicity and long-term versatility. A 0.90ct pear in a hidden halo can look larger than the same 0.90ct stone in a plain six-prong solitaire, but the halo usually costs more and needs more cleaning.

Are bezel settings good for pear shaped engagement rings?

Yes, bezel settings are a strong option for pear-shaped engagement rings because they protect the pointed tip better than most exposed-prong styles. They also tend to sit lower on the hand, which helps with comfort and snagging. Many active buyers choose a bezel in a pear diamond ring setting comparison for those practical reasons, especially in 950 platinum or 14K yellow gold. The trade-off is a more modern look and slightly less openness around the stone than a prong-set cathedral setting.

How many prongs should a pear diamond ring have?

Most pear diamonds need a V-prong at the tip plus several support prongs around the rounded end. Many well-made rings use five or six total contact points, though the right number depends on carat weight, proportions, and how high the stone sits. In a pear diamond ring setting comparison, prong count matters, but so do seat construction, gallery support, and metal choice. A 2.00ct pear in 14K white gold may need heavier prongs and a stronger basket than a 0.80ct pear in the same style.

Which pear diamond ring setting looks the biggest?

Halo settings usually create the biggest visual effect because the accent diamonds expand the outline of the center stone. Three-stone settings can also make the ring look larger by adding width across the finger. In a pear diamond ring setting comparison, solitaires rely more on the actual size of the center diamond, while bezels focus more on protection than size effect. If visual presence is your top goal, start with a halo or three-stone design, especially if your center stone is under 1.25ct.

How should you clean a pear diamond engagement ring?

Most pear diamond engagement rings can be cleaned with warm water, mild dish soap, and a soft toothbrush, paying close attention to the V-prong, gallery, and underside of the basket. Lab-grown diamonds are safe in an ultrasonic cleaner because they have the same hardness and crystal structure as mined diamonds, but rings with pavé halos, delicate antique-style settings, or loose accent stones should be inspected before frequent ultrasonic cleaning. For long-term care, have a jeweler check prongs, pavé, and side stones every 6 to 12 months.

pear diamond ring setting comparisonpear shaped engagement ring settingshalo vs solitaire pear diamondbezel pear diamond ringthree stone pear diamond ring

Ready to Find Your Perfect Diamond?

Explore our collection of certified lab-grown diamonds

Shop Diamonds